Rice Science ›› 2019, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (5): 309-318.DOI: 10.1016/j.rsci.2019.08.005
• Research Papers • Previous Articles Next Articles
Moe Kyi1,2(), Moh Moh Seinn1, Zaw Htwe Aung1,2, Kajihara Yoshinori3, Yamakawa Takeo4
Received:
2018-07-10
Accepted:
2018-11-02
Online:
2019-09-28
Published:
2019-05-24
Moe Kyi, Moh Moh Seinn, Zaw Htwe Aung, Kajihara Yoshinori, Yamakawa Takeo. Effects of Integrated Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Yield and Growth Parameters of Rice Varieties[J]. Rice Science, 2019, 26(5): 309-318.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
Physicochemical property | Value |
---|---|
Soil pH (soil/H2O 1.0:2.5) | 6.12 |
Soil pH (soil/KCl 1.0:2.5) | 4.82 |
EC (soil/H2O 1:5) (mS/m) | 9.42 |
Total N (%) | 0.15 |
Mineralizable N (g/kg) | 5.2 |
Total P2O5 (%) | 0.25 |
Available P (g/kg) | 15.37 |
Total K2O (%) | 0.48 |
Cation exchangeable capacity (cmol/kg) | 15.7 |
Exchangeable Ca (cmol/kg) | 7.18 |
Exchangeable Mg (cmol/kg) | 1.62 |
Exchangeable K (cmol/kg) | 0.37 |
Exchangeable Na (cmol/kg) | 0.75 |
Table 1 Physical and chemical properties of surface (0-15 cm) profile of soil.
Physicochemical property | Value |
---|---|
Soil pH (soil/H2O 1.0:2.5) | 6.12 |
Soil pH (soil/KCl 1.0:2.5) | 4.82 |
EC (soil/H2O 1:5) (mS/m) | 9.42 |
Total N (%) | 0.15 |
Mineralizable N (g/kg) | 5.2 |
Total P2O5 (%) | 0.25 |
Available P (g/kg) | 15.37 |
Total K2O (%) | 0.48 |
Cation exchangeable capacity (cmol/kg) | 15.7 |
Exchangeable Ca (cmol/kg) | 7.18 |
Exchangeable Mg (cmol/kg) | 1.62 |
Exchangeable K (cmol/kg) | 0.37 |
Exchangeable Na (cmol/kg) | 0.75 |
Sample | Ash content | Moisture | Total N | NH4-N | NO3-N | P2O5 | K2O | Ca | Mg | Na | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poultry manure | 37.37 | 21.86 | 4.87 | 0.75 | 0 | 4.56 | 2.14 | 8.85 | 0.75 | 0.28 | |
Cow manure | 31.48 | 46.4 | 2.39 | 0.19 | 0 | 1.91 | 1.52 | 1.09 | 0.55 | 0.34 | |
Compost | 28.13 | 41.02 | 2.16 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 2.27 | 1.18 | 5.28 | 0.21 | 0.85 |
Table 2 Chemical compositions of poultry manure, cow manure and compost.
Sample | Ash content | Moisture | Total N | NH4-N | NO3-N | P2O5 | K2O | Ca | Mg | Na | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poultry manure | 37.37 | 21.86 | 4.87 | 0.75 | 0 | 4.56 | 2.14 | 8.85 | 0.75 | 0.28 | |
Cow manure | 31.48 | 46.4 | 2.39 | 0.19 | 0 | 1.91 | 1.52 | 1.09 | 0.55 | 0.34 | |
Compost | 28.13 | 41.02 | 2.16 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 2.27 | 1.18 | 5.28 | 0.21 | 0.85 |
Fig. 1. Plant height, tiller number and changes in soil-plant analysis development (SPAD) value of Manawthukha (A, C and E) and Genkitsukushi (B, D and F) affected by integrated organic and inorganic fertilizers. N0, No-N fertilizer; CF50, 50% chemical fertilizer (CF); CF100, 100% CF; CF50PM50, 50% CF + 50% poultry manure (PM); CF50CM50, 50% CF + 50% cow manure (CM); CF50CP50, 50% CF + 50% compost (CP). CF, Chemical fertilizer; PM, Poultry manure; CM, Cow manure; CP, Compost.Error bar represents standard deviation (n = 3).
Fig. 2. Interaction effects of variety and integrated fertilization on dry matter of rice varieties at the critical growth stages. N0, No-N fertilizer; CF50, 50% chemical fertilizer (CF); CF100, 100% CF; CF50PM50, 50% CF + 50% poultry manure (PM); CF50CM50, 50% CF + 50% cow manure (CM); CF50CP50, 50% CF + 50% compost (CP).Error bar represents standard deviation (n = 3). The histograms with the same letter at each growth stage are not significantly different by the Tukey’s honestly significant difference test (P < 0.05).
Treatment | Harvest index | No. panicle | No. spikelets per panicle | Seed-setting rate (%) | 1000-grain weight (g) | Maximum panicle length (cm) | Yield (t/hm2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
per hill | ||||||||
Variety (V) | ||||||||
Manawthukha (indica) | 0.48 ± 0.66 b | 15.39 ± 0.77 a | 96.88 ± 7.10 a | 73.48 ± 5.87 b | 19.57 ± 1.04 b | 23.07 ± 1.67 a | 5.48 ± 0.21 b | |
Genkitsukushi (japonica) | 0.58 ± 0.02 a | 13.53 ± 0.29 b | 76.65 ± 3.79 b | 78.13 ± 3.05 a | 27.25 ± 0.78 a | 20.92 ± 1.11 b | 6.71 ± 0.86 a | |
Tukey HSD0.05 | 0.05 | 1.33 | 17.89 | 0.7 | 2.28 | 1.16 | 0.32 | |
Integrated fertilization (F) | ||||||||
N0 | 0.49 ± 0.07 ab | 12.58 ± 0.50 c | 68.24 ± 7.90 b | 70.25 ± 2.01 c | 24.54 ± 2.01 a | 17.05 ± 5.65 b | 4.66 ± 0.20 c | |
CF50 | 0.43 ± 0.03 b | 13.50 ± 0.76 c | 71.46 ± 7.10 b | 72.86 ± 5.80 b | 23.69 ± 0.12 a | 22.50 ± 1.74 a | 5.19 ± 0.73 bc | |
CF100 | 0.51 ± 0.05 a | 16.08 ± 0.51 ab | 91.11 ± 6.34 a | 79.75 ± 3.88 a | 23.15 ± 0.52 a | 23.07 ± 0.80 a | 6.80 ± 0.88 a | |
CF50PM50 | 0.54 ± 0.04 a | 16.68 ± 0.53 a | 99.49 ± 2.24 a | 82.08 ± 5.40 a | 23.36 ± 1.04 a | 23.57 ± 0.64 a | 7.42 ± 0.23 a | |
CF50CM50 | 0.55 ± 0.06 a | 14.08 ± 0.29 bc | 96.88 ± 3.77 a | 75.27 ± 4.71 b | 22.97 ± 0.99 a | 22.72 ± 0.45 a | 6.47 ± 0.31 ab | |
CF50CP50 | 0.52 ± 0.02 a | 13.83 ± 0.57 bc | 93.45 ± 8.04 a | 74.61 ± 3.22 b | 22.75 ± 0.77 a | 23.07 ± 0.72 a | 6.03 ± 1.04 abc | |
Tukey HSD0.05 | 0.07 | 2.53 | 14.97 | 2.53 | 1.87 | 3.4 | 1.47 | |
V | 0.007 | 0.0265 | 0.0397 | 0.0012 | 0.0047 | 0.0154 | 0.0038 | |
F | 0.0005 | 0.0004 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | 0.0809 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | |
V × F | 0.0389 | 0.982 | < 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0494 | 0.0528 | 0.0034 | |
CV (%) | 8.27 | 9.65 | 9.51 | 10.85 | 4.4 | 8.54 | 13.31 |
Table 3 Harvest index, yield and yield components of rice affected by integrated organic and inorganic fertilizers.
Treatment | Harvest index | No. panicle | No. spikelets per panicle | Seed-setting rate (%) | 1000-grain weight (g) | Maximum panicle length (cm) | Yield (t/hm2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
per hill | ||||||||
Variety (V) | ||||||||
Manawthukha (indica) | 0.48 ± 0.66 b | 15.39 ± 0.77 a | 96.88 ± 7.10 a | 73.48 ± 5.87 b | 19.57 ± 1.04 b | 23.07 ± 1.67 a | 5.48 ± 0.21 b | |
Genkitsukushi (japonica) | 0.58 ± 0.02 a | 13.53 ± 0.29 b | 76.65 ± 3.79 b | 78.13 ± 3.05 a | 27.25 ± 0.78 a | 20.92 ± 1.11 b | 6.71 ± 0.86 a | |
Tukey HSD0.05 | 0.05 | 1.33 | 17.89 | 0.7 | 2.28 | 1.16 | 0.32 | |
Integrated fertilization (F) | ||||||||
N0 | 0.49 ± 0.07 ab | 12.58 ± 0.50 c | 68.24 ± 7.90 b | 70.25 ± 2.01 c | 24.54 ± 2.01 a | 17.05 ± 5.65 b | 4.66 ± 0.20 c | |
CF50 | 0.43 ± 0.03 b | 13.50 ± 0.76 c | 71.46 ± 7.10 b | 72.86 ± 5.80 b | 23.69 ± 0.12 a | 22.50 ± 1.74 a | 5.19 ± 0.73 bc | |
CF100 | 0.51 ± 0.05 a | 16.08 ± 0.51 ab | 91.11 ± 6.34 a | 79.75 ± 3.88 a | 23.15 ± 0.52 a | 23.07 ± 0.80 a | 6.80 ± 0.88 a | |
CF50PM50 | 0.54 ± 0.04 a | 16.68 ± 0.53 a | 99.49 ± 2.24 a | 82.08 ± 5.40 a | 23.36 ± 1.04 a | 23.57 ± 0.64 a | 7.42 ± 0.23 a | |
CF50CM50 | 0.55 ± 0.06 a | 14.08 ± 0.29 bc | 96.88 ± 3.77 a | 75.27 ± 4.71 b | 22.97 ± 0.99 a | 22.72 ± 0.45 a | 6.47 ± 0.31 ab | |
CF50CP50 | 0.52 ± 0.02 a | 13.83 ± 0.57 bc | 93.45 ± 8.04 a | 74.61 ± 3.22 b | 22.75 ± 0.77 a | 23.07 ± 0.72 a | 6.03 ± 1.04 abc | |
Tukey HSD0.05 | 0.07 | 2.53 | 14.97 | 2.53 | 1.87 | 3.4 | 1.47 | |
V | 0.007 | 0.0265 | 0.0397 | 0.0012 | 0.0047 | 0.0154 | 0.0038 | |
F | 0.0005 | 0.0004 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | 0.0809 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | |
V × F | 0.0389 | 0.982 | < 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0494 | 0.0528 | 0.0034 | |
CV (%) | 8.27 | 9.65 | 9.51 | 10.85 | 4.4 | 8.54 | 13.31 |
Fig. 3. Interaction effect of variety and integrated fertilization on rice yield. N0, No N fertilizer; CF50, 50% chemical fertilizer (CF); CF100, 100% CF; CF50PM50, 50% CF + 50% poultry manure (PM); CF50CM50, 50% CF + 50% cow manure (CM); CF50CP50, 50% CF + 50% compost (CP).Error bar represents standard deviation (n = 3). The histograms with the same letter are not significantly different by the Tukey’s honestly significant difference test (P < 0.05).
[1] | Akoumianakis Κ A, Karapanos Ι C, Giakoumaki Μ, Alexopoulos A A, Passam H C.2011. Nitrogen, season and cultivar affect radish growth, yield, sponginess and hollowness.Int J Plant Prod, 5(2): 111-120. |
[2] | Arif M, Tasneem M, Bashir F, Yassen G, Iqbal R M.2014. Effect of integrated use of organic manures and inorganic fertilizers on yield and yield components of rice.J Agric Res, 52(2): 197-206. |
[3] | Barakat M A, Ismail S M, Ehsan M.2016. Immobilization of Ni and Zn in soil by cow and chicken manure.Int J Waste Resour, 6: 228. |
[4] | Binh N T, Shima K.2018. Nitrogen mineralization in soil amended with compost and urea as affected by plant residues supplements with controlled C/N ratios.J Adv Agric Technol, 5: 8-13. |
[5] | Biswas T, Paul S K, Sarkar M A R, Sarkar S K.2016. Integrated use of poultry manure with prilled urea and urea super granules for improving yield and protein content of aromatic rice (cv. BRRI dhan 50).Progress Agric, 27: 86-93. |
[6] | Cao Y S, Tian Y H, Yin B, Zhu Z L.2013. Assessment of ammonia volatilization from paddy fields under crop management practices aimed to increase grain yield and N efficiency.Field Crops Res, 147: 23-31. |
[7] | Cataldo D A, Schrader L E, Youngs V L.1974. Analysis by digestion and colorimetric assay of total nitrogen in plant tissues high in nitrate.Crop Sci, 14(6): 854-856. |
[8] | Chao X, Wu L H, Ju X T, Zhang F S.2005. Role of nitrification inhibitor DMPP (3,4-dimethylpyrazole Phosphate) in NO3-N accumulation in greengrocery (Brassica campestris L. ssp chinensis) and vegetable soil. J Environ Sci, 17(1): 81-83. |
[9] | Curtin D, Wright C E, Beare M H, Mccallum F M.2006. Hot water-extractable nitrogen as an indicator of soil nitrogen availability.Soil Sci Soc Am J, 70(5): 1512-1521. |
[10] | Eghball B, Wienhold B J, Gilley J E, Eigenberg R A.2002. Mineralization of manure nutrients.J Soil Water Conserv, 57: 470-473. |
[11] | Garnett T, Conn V, Kaiser B N.2009. Root based approaches to improving nitrogen use efficiency in plants.Plant Cell Environ, 32(9): 1272-1283. |
[12] | Gil M V, Carballo M T, Calvo L F.2011. Modelling N mineralization from bovine manure and sewage sludge composts.Bioresour Technol, 102: 863-871. |
[13] | Hasanuzzaman M, Ahamed K U, Rahmatullah N M, Akhter N, Nahar K, Rahman M L.2010. Plant growth characters and productivity of wetland rice (Oryza sativa L.) as affected by application of different manures. Emir J Food Agric, 22: 46-58. |
[14] | Hu R F, Cao J M, Huang J K, Peng S B, Huang J L, Zhong X H, Zou Y B, Yang J C, Buresh R J.2007. Farmer participatory testing of standard and modified site-specific nitrogen management for irrigated rice in China.Agric Syst, 94(2): 331-340. |
[15] | Huang J L, He F, Cui K H, Buresh R J, Xu B, Gong W H, Peng S B.2008. Determination of optimal nitrogen rate for rice varieties using a chlorophyll meter.Field Crops Res, 105: 70-80. |
[16] | Hussain N, Hassan G, Arshadullah M, Mujeeb F.2001. Evaluation of amendments for the improvement of physical properties of sodic soil.Int J Agric Biol, 3: 319-322. |
[17] | John F, Pain B F, Chambers B J, Williams J C.2000. Plant uptake of nitrogen from the organic nitrogen fraction of animal manures: A laboratory experiment.J Agric Sci, 134(2):159-168. |
[18] | Kenchaiah A.1997. Organic farming in rice [Ph.D. Thesis]. Tamil Coimbatore: Nadu Agricultural University. |
[19] | Khalil M I, Hossain M B, Schmidhalter U.2005. Carbon and nitrogen mineralization in different upland soils of the subtropics treated with organic materials.Soil Biol Biochem, 37(8): 1507-1518. |
[20] | Kirchmann H, Lundvall A.1993. Relationship between nitrogen immobilization and volatile fatty acids in soil after application of pig and cattle slurry.Biol Fert Soils, 15(3): 161-164. |
[21] | Krupnik T J, Six J, Ladha J K, Paine M J, Kessel C V.2004. An assessment of fertilizer nitrogen recovery efficiency by grain crops. In: Mosier A R. Agriculture and the Nitrogen Cycle: Assessing the Impacts of Fertilizer Use on Food Production and the Environment. Paris, France: Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment. |
[22] | Liang Y C, Yang Y F, Yang C G, Shen Q R, Zhou J M, Yang L Z.2003. Soil enzymatic activity and growth of rice and barley as influenced by organic matter in an anthropogenic soil.Geoderma, 115: 149-160. |
[23] | Liu X W, Wang H Y, Zhou J M, Hu F Q, Zhu D J, Chen Z M, Liu Y Z.2016. Effect of N fertilization pattern on rice yield, N use efficiency and fertilizer-N fate in the Yangtze River basin, China.PLoS One, 11: e0166002. |
[24] | Masarirambi M T, Mandisodza F C, Mashingaidze A B, Bhebhe E.2012. Influence of plant population and seed tuber size on growth and yield components of potato (Solanum tuberosum). Int J Agr Biol, 14: 545-549. |
[25] | Miah M M U.1994. Prospects and problems of organic farming in Bangladesh. Paper presented at the Workshop on Integrated Nutrient Management for Sustainable Agriculture held at SRDI, Dhaka: 26-28. |
[26] | Muramoto J, Goto I, Ninaki M.1992. Rapid analysis of exchangeable cations and cation exchange capacity (CEC) of soils by shaking extraction method.J Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 63: 210-215. |
[27] | Murphy J, Riley J P.1962. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters.Anal Chim Acta, 27: 31-36. |
[28] | Myint A K, Yamakawa T, Zenmyo T, Thao H T B, Sarr P S.2011. Effects of organic-manure application on growth, grain yield, and nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium recoveries of rice variety Manawthuka in paddy soils of differing fertility.Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal, 42: 457-474. |
[29] | Nishio M.2007. Basic Knowledge of Using Compost and Organic Fertilizers. Tokyo: Association of Rural and Fishing Cooperation: 213. |
[30] | Nuruzzaman M, Yamamoto Y, Nitta Y, Yoshida T, Miyazaki A.2000. Varietal differences in tillering ability of fourteen japonica and indica rice varieties. Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 46(2): 381-391. |
[31] | Ohyama T, Ito M, Kobayashi K, Araki S, Yasuyoshi S, Sasaki O, Yamazaki T, Soyama K, Tanemura R, Mizuno Y, Ikarashi T.1991. Analytical procedures of N, P, K contents in plant and manure materials using H2SO4-H2O2 Kjeldahl digestion method.Bull Facul Agric Niigata Univ, 43: 110-120. |
[32] | Peng S B, Yang J C.2003. Current status of the research on high yielding and high efficiency in resource use and improving grain quality in rice.Chin J Rice Sci, 17: 275-280. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[33] | Peng S B, Buresh R J, Huang J L, Zhong X H, Zou Y B, Yang J C, Wang G H, Liu Y Y, Hu R F, Tang Q Y, Cui K H, Zhang F S, Dobermann A.2010. Improving nitrogen fertilization in rice by site-specific N management: A review.Agron Sustain Dev, 30(3): 649-656. |
[34] | Razzaque M M A.1996. Comparative study on the effect of rice straw, farmyard manure and fertilizer nitrogen on the growth and yields of BR11 rice. [MS. Thesis]. Mymensingh: Bangladesh Agricultural University. |
[35] | Sahrawat K L.1983. Nitrogen availability indexes for submerged rice soils.Adv Agron, 36: 415-451. |
[36] | Sharma A R, Mitra B N.1991. Direct and residual effect of organic material and phosphorous fertilizers in rice (Oryza sativa L.) based cropping System. Ind J Agron, 36: 299-303. |
[37] | Singh G R, Chaure N K, Parihar S S.2001. Organic farming for sustainable agriculture.Ind Farming, 52: 12-17. |
[38] | Sudarsono W A, Melati M, Aziz S A.2014. Growth and yield of organic rice with cow manure application in the first cropping season.Agrivita J Agric Sci, 36: 19-25. |
[39] | Truog E.1930. The determination of the readily available phosphorus in soils.J Amer Soci Agron, 22: 874-882. |
[40] | Vose P B, Blixt S G.1984. Crop breeding: A contemporary basis. Oxford (Oxfordshire), New York: Pergamon Press: 443. |
[41] | Whitmore A P.2007. Determination of the mineralization of nitrogen from composted chicken manure as affected by temperature.Nutr Cycl Agroecosys, 77: 225-232. |
[42] | Yang Y C, Zhang M, Li Y C, Fan X H, Geng Y Q.2012. Controlled release urea improved nitrogen use efficiency, activities of leaf enzymes, and rice yield.Soil Sci Soc Am J, 76(6): 2307-2317. |
[43] | Yoshida S.1981. Fundamental of Rice Crop Science. Los Baños, Laguna, the Philippines: International Rice Research Institute: 269 |
[44] | Zhang M, Yao Y L, Tian Y H, Ceng K, Zhao M, Zhao M, Yin B.2018. Increasing yield and N use efficiency with organic fertilizer in Chinese intensive rice cropping systems.Field Crops Res, 227: 102-109. |
[45] | Zhu G L, Peng S B, Huang J L, Cui K H, Nie L X, Wang F.2016. Genetic improvements in rice yield and concomitant increases in radiation and nitrogen-use efficiency in middle reaches of Yangtze River.Sci Rep, 6: 21049. |
[1] | Prathap V, Suresh KUMAR, Nand Lal MEENA, Chirag MAHESHWARI, Monika DALAL, Aruna TYAGI. Phosphorus Starvation Tolerance in Rice Through a Combined Physiological, Biochemical and Proteome Analysis [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 8-. |
[2] | Serena REGGI, Elisabetta ONELLI, Alessandra MOSCATELLI, Nadia STROPPA, Matteo Dell’ANNO, Kiril PERFANOV, Luciana ROSSI. Seed-Specific Expression of Apolipoprotein A-IMilano Dimer in Rice Engineered Lines [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 6-. |
[3] | Sundus ZAFAR, XU Jianlong. Recent Advances to Enhance Nutritional Quality of Rice [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 4-. |
[4] | Kankunlanach KHAMPUANG, Nanthana CHAIWONG, Atilla YAZICI, Baris DEMIRER, Ismail CAKMAK, Chanakan PROM-U-THAI. Effect of Sulfur Fertilization on Productivity and Grain Zinc Yield of Rice Grown under Low and Adequate Soil Zinc Applications [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 9-. |
[5] | FAN Fengfeng, CAI Meng, LUO Xiong, LIU Manman, YUAN Huanran, CHENG Mingxing, Ayaz AHMAD, LI Nengwu, LI Shaoqing. Novel QTLs from Wild Rice Oryza longistaminata Confer Rice Strong Tolerance to High Temperature at Seedling Stage [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 14-. |
[6] | LIN Shaodan, YAO Yue, LI Jiayi, LI Xiaobin, MA Jie, WENG Haiyong, CHENG Zuxin, YE Dapeng. Application of UAV-Based Imaging and Deep Learning in Assessment of Rice Blast Resistance [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 10-. |
[7] | Md. Forshed DEWAN, Md. AHIDUZZAMAN, Md. Nahidul ISLAM, Habibul Bari SHOZIB. Potential Benefits of Bioactive Compounds of Traditional Rice Grown in South and South-East Asia: A Review [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 5-. |
[8] | Raja CHAKRABORTY, Pratap KALITA, Saikat SEN. Phenolic Profile, Antioxidant, Antihyperlipidemic and Cardiac Risk Preventive Effect of Chakhao Poireiton (A Pigmented Black Rice) in High-Fat High-Sugar induced Rats [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 11-. |
[9] | LI Qianlong, FENG Qi, WANG Heqin, KANG Yunhai, ZHANG Conghe, DU Ming, ZHANG Yunhu, WANG Hui, CHEN Jinjie, HAN Bin, FANG Yu, WANG Ahong. Genome-Wide Dissection of Quan 9311A Breeding Process and Application Advantages [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 7-. |
[10] | JI Dongling, XIAO Wenhui, SUN Zhiwei, LIU Lijun, GU Junfei, ZHANG Hao, Tom Matthew HARRISON, LIU Ke, WANG Zhiqin, WANG Weilu, YANG Jianchang. Translocation and Distribution of Carbon-Nitrogen in Relation to Rice Yield and Grain Quality as Affected by High Temperature at Early Panicle Initiation Stage [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 12-. |
[11] | Nazaratul Ashifa Abdullah Salim, Norlida Mat Daud, Julieta Griboff, Abdul Rahim Harun. Elemental Assessments in Paddy Soil for Geographical Traceability of Rice from Peninsular Malaysia [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(5): 486-498. |
[12] | Ammara Latif, Sun Ying, Pu Cuixia, Noman Ali. Rice Curled Its Leaves Either Adaxially or Abaxially to Combat Drought Stress [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(5): 405-416. |
[13] | Liu Qiao, Qiu Linlin, Hua Yangguang, Li Jing, Pang Bo, Zhai Yufeng, Wang Dekai. LHD3 Encoding a J-Domain Protein Controls Heading Date in Rice [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(5): 437-448. |
[14] | Lu Xuedan, Li Fan, Xiao Yunhua, Wang Feng, Zhang Guilian, Deng Huabing, Tang Wenbang. Grain Shape Genes: Shaping the Future of Rice Breeding [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(5): 379-404. |
[15] | Zhang Guomei, Li Han, Liu Shanshan, Zhou Xuming, Lu Mingyang, Tang Liang, Sun Lihua. Water Extract of Rice False Smut Balls Activates Nrf2/HO-1 and Apoptosis Pathways, Causing Liver Injury [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(5): 473-485. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||