Rice Science ›› 2016, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (2): 69-77.DOI: 10.1016/j.rsci.2016.02.002
• Orginal Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Tao Chen1,2, Hao Wu1, Ya-dong Zhang1, Zhen Zhu1, Qi-yong Zhao1, Li-hui Zhou1, Shu Yao1, Ling Zhao1, Xin Yu1, Chun-fang Zhao1, Cai-lin Wang1()
Received:
2015-06-03
Accepted:
2015-10-08
Online:
2016-04-10
Published:
2015-12-31
Tao Chen, Hao Wu, Ya-dong Zhang, Zhen Zhu, Qi-yong Zhao, Li-hui Zhou, Shu Yao, Ling Zhao, Xin Yu, Chun-fang Zhao, Cai-lin Wang. Genetic Improvement of Japonica Rice Variety Wuyujing 3 for Stripe Disease Resistance and Eating Quality by Pyramiding Stv-bi and Wx-mq[J]. Rice Science, 2016, 23(2): 69-77.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
Fig. 1. Molecular detection of Stv-bi and Wx-mq genes for parts of plants in BC3F1 generation.M, 2 kb DNA marker; Lane 1, Wuyujing 3; Lane 2, Kanto 194; Lane 3, F1 (Wuyujing 3/Kanto 194); Lanes 4 to 24, Parts of plants in BC3F1 generation.
Line/Variety | Incident rate of rice stripe disease (%) | Resistance level | |
---|---|---|---|
Nanjing, Jiangsu Province | Yandu, Jiangsu Province | ||
K01 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.20 ± 0.20 | Highly resistant |
K02 | 1.41 ± 0.21 | 1.55 ± 0.30 | Highly resistant |
K03 | 1.15 ± 0.31 | 1.48 ± 0.32 | Highly resistant |
K04 | 0.20 ± 0.00 | 0.41 ± 0.20 | Highly resistant |
K05 | 0.26 ± 0.23 | 0.94 ± 0.23 | Highly resistant |
K06 | 0.26 ± 0.11 | 0.87 ± 0.23 | Highly resistant |
K07 | 2.73 ± 0.50 | 3.74 ± 0.51 | Highly resistant |
K08 | 0.07 ± 0.12 | 0.40 ± 0.20 | Highly resistant |
K09 | 0.88 ± 0.31 | 1.48 ± 0.31 | Highly resistant |
K10 | 0.79 ± 0.39 | 1.28 ± 0.12 | Highly resistant |
Kanto 194 | 0.28 ± 0.11 | 0.66 ± 0.18 | Highly resistant |
Wuyujing 3 | 64.82 ± 0.80 | 68.97 ± 0.41 | Highly susceptible |
Table 1 Comparison of resistance of rice stripe disease for improved lines and Wuyujing 3 (Mean ± SD).
Line/Variety | Incident rate of rice stripe disease (%) | Resistance level | |
---|---|---|---|
Nanjing, Jiangsu Province | Yandu, Jiangsu Province | ||
K01 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.20 ± 0.20 | Highly resistant |
K02 | 1.41 ± 0.21 | 1.55 ± 0.30 | Highly resistant |
K03 | 1.15 ± 0.31 | 1.48 ± 0.32 | Highly resistant |
K04 | 0.20 ± 0.00 | 0.41 ± 0.20 | Highly resistant |
K05 | 0.26 ± 0.23 | 0.94 ± 0.23 | Highly resistant |
K06 | 0.26 ± 0.11 | 0.87 ± 0.23 | Highly resistant |
K07 | 2.73 ± 0.50 | 3.74 ± 0.51 | Highly resistant |
K08 | 0.07 ± 0.12 | 0.40 ± 0.20 | Highly resistant |
K09 | 0.88 ± 0.31 | 1.48 ± 0.31 | Highly resistant |
K10 | 0.79 ± 0.39 | 1.28 ± 0.12 | Highly resistant |
Kanto 194 | 0.28 ± 0.11 | 0.66 ± 0.18 | Highly resistant |
Wuyujing 3 | 64.82 ± 0.80 | 68.97 ± 0.41 | Highly susceptible |
Line/Variety | PH (cm) | PL (cm) | PP | FGPL | SPL | FGPA | SPA | SSR (%) | TGW (g) | GWP (g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K01 | 97.9 | 15.7 | 14.3 | 1 397.9 | 1 452.2 | 98.6 | 102.6 | 96.3 | 25 | 33.6 |
K02 | 99.4 | 15 | 14.6 | 1 421.1 | 1 475.3 | 97.2 | 101 | 96.2 | 24.7 | 32.7 |
K03 | 99.1 | 15.4 | 14.3 | 1 289.6 | 1 354.7 | 90.8 | 95.5 | 95.2 | 24.7 | 31.2 |
K04 | 99.8 | 15.9 | 14.9 | 1 336.7 | 1 383.6 | 89.3 | 92.6 | 96.5 | 24.9 | 32.3 |
K05 | 99.7 | 15.5 | 13.4 | 1 249.0 | 1 291.6 | 93.6 | 96.8 | 96.7 | 25.9 | 32.1 |
K06 | 101.5 | 15.3 | 13.9 | 1 324.7 | 1 372.3 | 95.3 | 98.8 | 96.4 | 25.5 | 33.7 |
K07 | 100.2 | 15.9 | 13.4 | 1 288.7 | 1 329.5 | 96.3 | 99.4 | 96.9 | 25.1 | 32.2 |
K08 | 100.2 | 15.1 | 14 | 1 322.9 | 1 390.8 | 94.7 | 99.6 | 95.1 | 25.5 | 32.8 |
K09 | 100 | 15.6 | 13.7 | 1 292.0 | 1 347.2 | 94.3 | 98.4 | 95.8 | 25.6 | 33 |
K10 | 99.5 | 15.8 | 14.7 | 1 348.4 | 1 391.1 | 92 | 95 | 96.7 | 24.7 | 33.2 |
Wuyujing 3 | 98.6 | 15.6 | 13.6 | 1 258.5 | 1 325.4 | 93.6 | 98.6 | 95 | 25.9 | 32.8 |
Table 2 Comparison of main agronomic and yield traits for improved lines and Wuyujing 3.
Line/Variety | PH (cm) | PL (cm) | PP | FGPL | SPL | FGPA | SPA | SSR (%) | TGW (g) | GWP (g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K01 | 97.9 | 15.7 | 14.3 | 1 397.9 | 1 452.2 | 98.6 | 102.6 | 96.3 | 25 | 33.6 |
K02 | 99.4 | 15 | 14.6 | 1 421.1 | 1 475.3 | 97.2 | 101 | 96.2 | 24.7 | 32.7 |
K03 | 99.1 | 15.4 | 14.3 | 1 289.6 | 1 354.7 | 90.8 | 95.5 | 95.2 | 24.7 | 31.2 |
K04 | 99.8 | 15.9 | 14.9 | 1 336.7 | 1 383.6 | 89.3 | 92.6 | 96.5 | 24.9 | 32.3 |
K05 | 99.7 | 15.5 | 13.4 | 1 249.0 | 1 291.6 | 93.6 | 96.8 | 96.7 | 25.9 | 32.1 |
K06 | 101.5 | 15.3 | 13.9 | 1 324.7 | 1 372.3 | 95.3 | 98.8 | 96.4 | 25.5 | 33.7 |
K07 | 100.2 | 15.9 | 13.4 | 1 288.7 | 1 329.5 | 96.3 | 99.4 | 96.9 | 25.1 | 32.2 |
K08 | 100.2 | 15.1 | 14 | 1 322.9 | 1 390.8 | 94.7 | 99.6 | 95.1 | 25.5 | 32.8 |
K09 | 100 | 15.6 | 13.7 | 1 292.0 | 1 347.2 | 94.3 | 98.4 | 95.8 | 25.6 | 33 |
K10 | 99.5 | 15.8 | 14.7 | 1 348.4 | 1 391.1 | 92 | 95 | 96.7 | 24.7 | 33.2 |
Wuyujing 3 | 98.6 | 15.6 | 13.6 | 1 258.5 | 1 325.4 | 93.6 | 98.6 | 95 | 25.9 | 32.8 |
Line/Variety | Lishui, Jiangsu Province | Taizhou, Jiangsu Province | Average | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yield (kg/hm2) | Order | Yield (kg/hm2) | Order | Yield (kg/hm2) | Order | |
K01 | 7 543.5 | 5 | 10 680.0 | 4 | 9 111.8 | 3 |
K02 | 7 362.0 | 10 | 10 740.0 | 3 | 9 051.0 | 5 |
K03 | 7 335.0 | 11 | 10 132.5 | 10 | 8 733.8 | 11 |
K04 | 7 422.0 | 9 | 10 822.5 | 2 | 9 122.3 | 2 |
K05 | 7 485.0 | 6 | 10 035.0 | 11 | 8 760.0 | 10 |
K06 | 7 755.0 | 2 | 10 732.5 | 1 | 9 243.8 | 1 |
K07 | 7 887.0 | 1 | 10 155.0 | 9 | 9 021.0 | 6 |
K08 | 7 618.5 | 4 | 10 305.0 | 7 | 8 961.8 | 8 |
K09 | 7 740.0 | 3 | 10 432.5 | 6 | 9 086.3 | 4 |
K10 | 7 437.0 | 7 | 10 545.0 | 5 | 8 991.0 | 7 |
Wuyujing 3 | 7 429.5 | 8 | 10 257.0 | 8 | 8 843.3 | 9 |
Table 3 Comparison of actual yields for improved lines and Wuyujing 3.
Line/Variety | Lishui, Jiangsu Province | Taizhou, Jiangsu Province | Average | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yield (kg/hm2) | Order | Yield (kg/hm2) | Order | Yield (kg/hm2) | Order | |
K01 | 7 543.5 | 5 | 10 680.0 | 4 | 9 111.8 | 3 |
K02 | 7 362.0 | 10 | 10 740.0 | 3 | 9 051.0 | 5 |
K03 | 7 335.0 | 11 | 10 132.5 | 10 | 8 733.8 | 11 |
K04 | 7 422.0 | 9 | 10 822.5 | 2 | 9 122.3 | 2 |
K05 | 7 485.0 | 6 | 10 035.0 | 11 | 8 760.0 | 10 |
K06 | 7 755.0 | 2 | 10 732.5 | 1 | 9 243.8 | 1 |
K07 | 7 887.0 | 1 | 10 155.0 | 9 | 9 021.0 | 6 |
K08 | 7 618.5 | 4 | 10 305.0 | 7 | 8 961.8 | 8 |
K09 | 7 740.0 | 3 | 10 432.5 | 6 | 9 086.3 | 4 |
K10 | 7 437.0 | 7 | 10 545.0 | 5 | 8 991.0 | 7 |
Wuyujing 3 | 7 429.5 | 8 | 10 257.0 | 8 | 8 843.3 | 9 |
Fig. 3. Field performance and appearance quality for two improved lines and Wuyujing 3.A and D, Improved line K01; B and E, Improved line K04; C and F, Wuyujing 3.
Line/Variety | Milling quality | Appearance quality | Eating quality | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brown rice rate (%) | Milled rice rate (%) | Head milled rice rate (%) | Grain length | Length/width ratio | Chalky grain rate (%) | Degree of chalkiness (%) | Gel consistency | Alkali spreading value | Amylose content (%) | |
K01 | 79.5 | 71.8 | 68.5 | 4.72 | 1.65 | 8.5** | 1.2** | 80.8** | 5.8 | 8.2** |
K02 | 78.7 | 70.2 | 65.8 | 4.46 | 1.65 | 24.2** | 4.2** | 81.2** | 5.8 | 8.2** |
K03 | 78.7 | 70.9 | 68 | 4.53 | 1.68 | 13.7** | 2.9** | 79.7** | 5.8 | 7.5** |
K04 | 79.8 | 71.9 | 68.1 | 4.53 | 1.66 | 14.7** | 2.9** | 80.1** | 5.7 | 7.5** |
K05 | 80.3 | 72.5 | 68.6 | 4.98 | 1.63 | 23.9** | 4.0** | 81.1** | 5.8 | 7.6** |
K06 | 80.3 | 71.8 | 68.7 | 4.95 | 1.63 | 14.1** | 2.1** | 81.2** | 5.8 | 7.6** |
K07 | 79.2 | 71.2 | 68.5 | 4.74 | 1.69 | 13.7** | 2.9** | 81.5** | 5.8 | 8.1** |
K08 | 79.5 | 71.2 | 68.2 | 4.93 | 1.66 | 12.2** | 2.2** | 81.7** | 5.7 | 8.7** |
K09 | 79.7 | 72.4 | 69.2 | 4.93 | 1.67 | 18.0** | 4.0** | 81.7** | 5.7 | 8.9** |
K10 | 78.7 | 71.6 | 69.1 | 4.7 | 1.66 | 21.8** | 4.5** | 82.2** | 5.8 | 8.9** |
Wuyujing 3 | 78.8 | 70.1 | 67.1 | 4.99 | 1.61 | 45.2 | 9.2 | 75.8 | 5.8 | 14.2 |
Table 4 Comparison of main quality traits for improved lines and Wuyujing 3.
Line/Variety | Milling quality | Appearance quality | Eating quality | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brown rice rate (%) | Milled rice rate (%) | Head milled rice rate (%) | Grain length | Length/width ratio | Chalky grain rate (%) | Degree of chalkiness (%) | Gel consistency | Alkali spreading value | Amylose content (%) | |
K01 | 79.5 | 71.8 | 68.5 | 4.72 | 1.65 | 8.5** | 1.2** | 80.8** | 5.8 | 8.2** |
K02 | 78.7 | 70.2 | 65.8 | 4.46 | 1.65 | 24.2** | 4.2** | 81.2** | 5.8 | 8.2** |
K03 | 78.7 | 70.9 | 68 | 4.53 | 1.68 | 13.7** | 2.9** | 79.7** | 5.8 | 7.5** |
K04 | 79.8 | 71.9 | 68.1 | 4.53 | 1.66 | 14.7** | 2.9** | 80.1** | 5.7 | 7.5** |
K05 | 80.3 | 72.5 | 68.6 | 4.98 | 1.63 | 23.9** | 4.0** | 81.1** | 5.8 | 7.6** |
K06 | 80.3 | 71.8 | 68.7 | 4.95 | 1.63 | 14.1** | 2.1** | 81.2** | 5.8 | 7.6** |
K07 | 79.2 | 71.2 | 68.5 | 4.74 | 1.69 | 13.7** | 2.9** | 81.5** | 5.8 | 8.1** |
K08 | 79.5 | 71.2 | 68.2 | 4.93 | 1.66 | 12.2** | 2.2** | 81.7** | 5.7 | 8.7** |
K09 | 79.7 | 72.4 | 69.2 | 4.93 | 1.67 | 18.0** | 4.0** | 81.7** | 5.7 | 8.9** |
K10 | 78.7 | 71.6 | 69.1 | 4.7 | 1.66 | 21.8** | 4.5** | 82.2** | 5.8 | 8.9** |
Wuyujing 3 | 78.8 | 70.1 | 67.1 | 4.99 | 1.61 | 45.2 | 9.2 | 75.8 | 5.8 | 14.2 |
Line/Variety | Odor | Appearance | Palatability | Fragrance | Comprehensive score | Taste value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K01 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 1.40** | 0.90* | 1.50** | 0.96** |
K02 | 0.2 | 1.10* | 1.30* | 1.20** | 1.50** | 1.13** |
K03 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.51 |
K04 | 0.1 | 0.90* | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.74 |
K05 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.58 |
K06 | 0 | 0.5 | 1 | 1.00* | 1.38* | 0.84* |
K07 | 0.1 | 1.20** | 1.70** | 1.60** | 1.90** | 1.42** |
K08 | 0.1 | 1.10* | 1.40** | 0.90* | 1.50** | 1.02** |
K09 | 0 | 0.90* | 1.30* | 1.30** | 1.40* | 1.10** |
K10 | 0.2 | 0.90* | 1.30* | 1.20** | 1.20* | 1.16** |
Wuyujing 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Table 5 Score of taste indices for improved lines and Wuyujing 3.
Line/Variety | Odor | Appearance | Palatability | Fragrance | Comprehensive score | Taste value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K01 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 1.40** | 0.90* | 1.50** | 0.96** |
K02 | 0.2 | 1.10* | 1.30* | 1.20** | 1.50** | 1.13** |
K03 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.51 |
K04 | 0.1 | 0.90* | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.74 |
K05 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.58 |
K06 | 0 | 0.5 | 1 | 1.00* | 1.38* | 0.84* |
K07 | 0.1 | 1.20** | 1.70** | 1.60** | 1.90** | 1.42** |
K08 | 0.1 | 1.10* | 1.40** | 0.90* | 1.50** | 1.02** |
K09 | 0 | 0.90* | 1.30* | 1.30** | 1.40* | 1.10** |
K10 | 0.2 | 0.90* | 1.30* | 1.20** | 1.20* | 1.16** |
Wuyujing 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
[1] | Chen T, Luo M R, Zhang Y D, Zhu Z, Zhao L, Zhao Q Y, Zhou L H, Yao S, Yu X, Wang C L.2010. Detection of Wx-mq gene for low-amylose content by tetra-primer amplification refractory mutation system PCR in rice.Chin J Rice Sci, 27(5): 529-534. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[2] | Chen Z D, Zong W G, Yang J, Wang J.2007. Study on the yielding traits and quality characters of Wuyujing 3 and the suggestion for rice breeding.J Jinling Instit Technol, 23(4): 50-53. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[3] | Chen Z X, Zuo S M, Zhang Y F, Zhu J K, Wang L P, Feng F, Ma Y Y, Pan X B.2012. Rice pyramiding breeding using sheath blight resistance QTL qSB-9TQ and stripe disease resistance gene Stv-bi.Acta Agron Sin, 38(7): 1178-1186. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[4] | Dellaporta S L, Wood J, Hicks J B.1983. A plant DNA minipreparation: Version II.Plant Mol Biol Rep, 1(1): 19-21. |
[5] | Jiang Q X, Yang M F, Wang Z M, Qian Y X.1993. The breeding and application of medium japonica new cultivar Wuyujing 3. Jiangsu Agric Sci, 21(3): 8-10. (in Chinese) |
[6] | Li J Y, Mao W X, Yang L J, Zhou G Y, Liu J, Yan Q T, Mi D.2004. Introducing antisense waxy gene into rice seeds reduces grain amylose contents using a safe transgenic technique.Chin Sci Bull, 49(24): 2556-2561. (in Chinese) |
[7] | Liang N T, Wei Y B.1995. Tasting test of rice and its assessment method.Xinjiang Agric Sci, (6): 238-239. (in Chinese) |
[8] | Pan X B, Chen Z X, Zuo S M, Zhang Y F, Wu X J, Ma N, Jiang Q X, Que J H, Zhou C H.2009. A new rice cultivar Wulingjing 1 with resistance to rice stripe virus bred by marker assisted selection.Acta Agron Sin, 35(10): 1851-1857. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[9] | Sato M, Ando I, Numaguchi K, Horisue N.1996. Breeding of low amylose content paddy rice variety ‘Milky Queen’ with good eating quality.Jpn J Breeding, 46(suppl 1): 221. |
[10] | Sheng S L, Zhai H Q, Yang T N.1997. Review and prospect of high yield breeding of japonica rice in Jiangsu Province.China Rice, 3(4): 9-12. (in Chinese) |
[11] | Sun Y Y, Lv Y, Dong C L, Wang P R, Huang X Q, Deng X J.2005. Genetic relationship among Wx gene, AC, GC and GT of rice.Acta Agron Sin, 31(5): 535-539. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[12] | Wang C L, Chen T, Zhang Y D, Zhu Z, Zhao L, Lin J.2009. Breeding of a new rice variety with good eating quality by marker assisted selection.Chin J Rice Sci, 23(1): 25-30. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[13] | Wang C L, Zhang Y D, Zhu Z, Chen T, Zhao Q Y, Zhou L H, Yao S, Zhao L, Li Y S.2011. Breeding on new varieties of japonica rice with resistance to stripe virus disease and good eating quality.North Rice, 41(1): 67-71. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[14] | Wang C L, Zhang Y D, Zhu Z, Chen T, Zhao Q Y, Zhao L, Zhou L H, Yao S.2012. Breeding and utilization of new japonica rice Nanjing 5055 with good taste.Bull Agric Sci Technol, 2: 84-88. (in Chinese) |
[15] | Wang C L, Zhang Y D, Zhu Z, Yao S, Zhao Q Y, Chen T, Zhou L H, Zhao L.2013. Breeding and utilization of new japonica rice Nanjing 9108 with good taste.Jiangsu Agric Sci, 41(9): 86-88. (in Chinese) |
[16] | Washio O, Ezuka A, Sakurgi Y, Toriyama K.1967. Studies on the breeding of rice varieties resistant to stripe disease: I. Varietal difference in resistance to rice stripe disease.Jpn J Breeding, 17(2): 91-98. |
[17] | Yao S, Chen T, Zhang Y D, Zhu Z, Zhao L, Zhao Q Y, Zhou L H, Wang C L.2010. Transferring translucent endosperm mutant gene Wx-mq and rice stripe disease resistance gene Stv-bi by marker-assisted selection in rice (Oryza sativa).Chin J Rice Sci, 18(2): 102-109. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[18] | Yao S, Chen T, Zhang Y D, Zhu Z, Zhao Q Y, Zhou L H, Zhao L, Li Y S, Wang C L.2014. Improving resistance to rice stripe disease of restorer line Ninghui 8 by molecular marker-assistant selection.Chin J Rice Sci, 28(1): 85-91. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[19] | Zhang G H, Zeng D L, Guo L B, Liu H J, Hu J, Gao Z Y, Hua Z H, Qian Q.2007. Nutrtion-functional rice created by polymerizing ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (AGP) and giant embryo (ge) genes.Chin J Rice Sci, 21(6): 567-572. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[20] | Zhang Y R, Zhou X Q, Yang L L.2009. Present situation and expectation on methods for taste evaluation of rice.J Chin Cereals Oils Assoc, 24(8): 155-159. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[21] | Zhou T, Zhou Y J, Cheng Z B, Yang R M, Ji J A.2007. Identification of resistance to rice stripe virus in japonica rice varieties and analysis for its inheritance of Zhendao 88. Acta Phytophy Sin, 35(5): 475-479. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[22] | Zhuang J Y, Zhu Y J, Tu G Q, Ying J Z, Fan Y Y.2010. Gene pyramiding assisted breeding of new hybrid rice combination Zhongyou 161 with high yield and high grain quality. Hybrid Rice, 25(5): 12-14. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | Prathap V, Suresh KUMAR, Nand Lal MEENA, Chirag MAHESHWARI, Monika DALAL, Aruna TYAGI. Phosphorus Starvation Tolerance in Rice Through a Combined Physiological, Biochemical and Proteome Analysis [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 8-. |
[2] | Serena REGGI, Elisabetta ONELLI, Alessandra MOSCATELLI, Nadia STROPPA, Matteo Dell’ANNO, Kiril PERFANOV, Luciana ROSSI. Seed-Specific Expression of Apolipoprotein A-IMilano Dimer in Rice Engineered Lines [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 6-. |
[3] | Sundus ZAFAR, XU Jianlong. Recent Advances to Enhance Nutritional Quality of Rice [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 4-. |
[4] | Kankunlanach KHAMPUANG, Nanthana CHAIWONG, Atilla YAZICI, Baris DEMIRER, Ismail CAKMAK, Chanakan PROM-U-THAI. Effect of Sulfur Fertilization on Productivity and Grain Zinc Yield of Rice Grown under Low and Adequate Soil Zinc Applications [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 9-. |
[5] | FAN Fengfeng, CAI Meng, LUO Xiong, LIU Manman, YUAN Huanran, CHENG Mingxing, Ayaz AHMAD, LI Nengwu, LI Shaoqing. Novel QTLs from Wild Rice Oryza longistaminata Confer Rice Strong Tolerance to High Temperature at Seedling Stage [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 14-. |
[6] | LIN Shaodan, YAO Yue, LI Jiayi, LI Xiaobin, MA Jie, WENG Haiyong, CHENG Zuxin, YE Dapeng. Application of UAV-Based Imaging and Deep Learning in Assessment of Rice Blast Resistance [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 10-. |
[7] | Md. Forshed DEWAN, Md. AHIDUZZAMAN, Md. Nahidul ISLAM, Habibul Bari SHOZIB. Potential Benefits of Bioactive Compounds of Traditional Rice Grown in South and South-East Asia: A Review [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 5-. |
[8] | Raja CHAKRABORTY, Pratap KALITA, Saikat SEN. Phenolic Profile, Antioxidant, Antihyperlipidemic and Cardiac Risk Preventive Effect of Chakhao Poireiton (A Pigmented Black Rice) in High-Fat High-Sugar induced Rats [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 11-. |
[9] | LI Qianlong, FENG Qi, WANG Heqin, KANG Yunhai, ZHANG Conghe, DU Ming, ZHANG Yunhu, WANG Hui, CHEN Jinjie, HAN Bin, FANG Yu, WANG Ahong. Genome-Wide Dissection of Quan 9311A Breeding Process and Application Advantages [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 7-. |
[10] | JI Dongling, XIAO Wenhui, SUN Zhiwei, LIU Lijun, GU Junfei, ZHANG Hao, Tom Matthew HARRISON, LIU Ke, WANG Zhiqin, WANG Weilu, YANG Jianchang. Translocation and Distribution of Carbon-Nitrogen in Relation to Rice Yield and Grain Quality as Affected by High Temperature at Early Panicle Initiation Stage [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 12-. |
[11] | Nazaratul Ashifa Abdullah Salim, Norlida Mat Daud, Julieta Griboff, Abdul Rahim Harun. Elemental Assessments in Paddy Soil for Geographical Traceability of Rice from Peninsular Malaysia [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(5): 486-498. |
[12] | Monica Ruffini Castiglione, Stefania Bottega, Carlo Sorce, Carmelina SpanÒ. Effects of Zinc Oxide Particles with Different Sizes on Root Development in Oryza sativa [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(5): 449-458. |
[13] | Tan Jingyi, Zhang Xiaobo, Shang Huihui, Li Panpan, Wang Zhonghao, Liao Xinwei, Xu Xia, Yang Shihua, Gong Junyi, Wu Jianli. ORYZA SATIVA SPOTTED-LEAF 41 (OsSPL41) Negatively Regulates Plant Immunity in Rice [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(5): 426-436. |
[14] | Ammara Latif, Sun Ying, Pu Cuixia, Noman Ali. Rice Curled Its Leaves Either Adaxially or Abaxially to Combat Drought Stress [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(5): 405-416. |
[15] | Liu Qiao, Qiu Linlin, Hua Yangguang, Li Jing, Pang Bo, Zhai Yufeng, Wang Dekai. LHD3 Encoding a J-Domain Protein Controls Heading Date in Rice [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(5): 437-448. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||